When I first heard that a hispanic man would be nominated to fill the role of Attorney General I was pleasantly surprised. Then, thanks to the wonders of the press, I was able to do some research about him. After researching him, the first thing that comes to mind is Haliburton!
Gonzales was a partner with a Houston law firm that had Haliburton as a client, and was also involved in suspicious dealings with Enron. He then, while a justice on the Texas Supreme Court, received a three thousand dollar bribe from Haliburton and refused to recuse himself from a controversial 2.6 million dollar case involving Haliburton. The Texas Supreme Court refused to hear the case, and Haliburton didn't have to pay the millions of dollars in damages.
So, the miraculous Alberto Gonzales, in the height of the controversy surrounding the cash-gift from Haliburton, continues his rise to prominence by joining G.W.'s White House staff as the Whie House counsel. There he fought like the devil to conceal the identities of the people on Cheney's secret energy task force.
So this guy's a real winner, eh? An ideal right-winger who puts the interests of the wealthy ahead of the common good. And let's not forget that he authorized the torture of the prisoners in Guantanomo and subverted the Geneva Convention. If this crook gets the nod from the senate, then it will truly be a dark day for America.
UPDATE: I challenge ya'll to provide me with some major accomplishments this fellow has made, that is besides maneuvering George Bush out of jury duty in '96. That's a pretty slick maneuever, maybe he will use his legal skills as the AG. Hoepefully, he won't get the chance. (Sources:
Nathan Newman, CommonDreams, 18 December 2000
David Lazarus, San Francisco Chronicle, 15 February 2002
David Johnston, James Risen, New York Times, 27 June 2004)

Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Nov 12, 2004
I've found some information from 24news.com.

A September, 2004, article about an August, 2002, memo that was sent to the White House by the Justice Department in response to a CIA request:

The memo, addressed to White House Counsel Alberto Gonzalez, reportedly said torturing a suspect in captivity "may be justified" if the US government employee involved "would be doing so in order to prevent further attacks on the United States by the al-Qaeda terrorist network."


Note that the memo was sent to, not authored by, Alberto Gonzalez. Do we have any documentation about what Gonzalez advised the President specifically about torture, or is the memo referred to in this article the basis for the allegation that Gonzalez endorsed torture? There is a big difference. If the memo I'm referring to here is indeed the basis for the allegation, Gonzalez has gotten a bum rap.

Cheers,
Daiwa
on Nov 12, 2004
Actually, the other thread on Gonzalez started by Myrrander has a link to a portion of the actual memo from Gonzalez to the President posted by psikotik. Seems, to me at least, to support the notion that Gonzalez has gotten a bum rap indeed.

Cheers,
Daiwa
on Nov 14, 2004
I would love to provide the memo to you but unfortunately John Ashcroft refused to release it. But I think it's safe to assume that Gonzales passed the information to the president, along with reccommendations about how to side step the G.C., and in doing so tacitly condoned the use of torture. Is the the kind of Justice you want? Is this your post 911 America? The one in which we become monsters in order to capture the monsters? Isn't that how evil truly operates? It asks us to abandon our principles in order to save them. And please don't take this "fellow hispanic" rap. I understand that it would be a good thing to be represented at the excutive level but this is about character and principle not skin color. Grow up and learn to think independently.
on Nov 14, 2004
With folks like crennaman, it's "safe to assume" anything that justifies an opinion.

Cheers,
Daiwa
2 Pages1 2